Contract Terms
These notes give a thorough analysis of the Contractual terms doctrine. It investigates the basic concepts and instances that underpin contract term . Each Terms of Contract case is given as a succinct overview, allowing the learner to rapidly comprehend the relevant information. The ratio of the case is followed by the explanation for the judgement and how the case produces the general principle. There is also advise on how to apply the case while offering legal advice.
Cases
Express terms of the contract
J.Evans & Son (Portsmouth) Ltd v Andrea Merzario[1976] 1WLR 1078
Importance of statement
Bannerman v White (1861) 10 CB NS 844
Timing of the Statement
Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 WLR 615
Schawel v Reade [1913] 2 IR 81
Reduced term into writing
Duffy v Newcastle United Football Co Ltd (2000) All ER (D) 892
Special knowledge and skill
Oscar Chess v Williams [1957] 1 WLR 370
Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith (Motors) [1965] 1 WLR 623
Parol Evidence Rule
Henderson v Arthur (1907)
Implied by Custom
Hutton v Warren [1836] 1 M & W 466
Officious bystander test
Shell v Lostock Garage [1977] 1 All ER 481
Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2KB 206
Business Efficacy Test
The Moorcock (1889) 14 PD 64
Term implied by Law
Liverpool City Council v Irwin [1977] AC 239
These notes give a thorough analysis of the Contractual terms doctrine. It investigates the basic concepts and instances that underpin contract term . Each Terms of Contract case is given as a succinct overview, allowing the learner to rapidly comprehend the relevant information. The ratio of the case is followed by the explanation for the judgement and how the case produces the general principle. There is also advise on how to apply the case while offering legal advice.
Cases
Express terms of the contract
J.Evans & Son (Portsmouth) Ltd v Andrea Merzario[1976] 1WLR 1078
Importance of statement
Bannerman v White (1861) 10 CB NS 844
Timing of the Statement
Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 WLR 615
Schawel v Reade [1913] 2 IR 81
Reduced term into writing
Duffy v Newcastle United Football Co Ltd (2000) All ER (D) 892
Special knowledge and skill
Oscar Chess v Williams [1957] 1 WLR 370
Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith (Motors) [1965] 1 WLR 623
Parol Evidence Rule
Henderson v Arthur (1907)
Implied by Custom
Hutton v Warren [1836] 1 M & W 466
Officious bystander test
Shell v Lostock Garage [1977] 1 All ER 481
Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2KB 206
Business Efficacy Test
The Moorcock (1889) 14 PD 64
Term implied by Law
Liverpool City Council v Irwin [1977] AC 239
These notes give a thorough analysis of the Contractual terms doctrine. It investigates the basic concepts and instances that underpin contract term . Each Terms of Contract case is given as a succinct overview, allowing the learner to rapidly comprehend the relevant information. The ratio of the case is followed by the explanation for the judgement and how the case produces the general principle. There is also advise on how to apply the case while offering legal advice.
Cases
Express terms of the contract
J.Evans & Son (Portsmouth) Ltd v Andrea Merzario[1976] 1WLR 1078
Importance of statement
Bannerman v White (1861) 10 CB NS 844
Timing of the Statement
Routledge v McKay [1954] 1 WLR 615
Schawel v Reade [1913] 2 IR 81
Reduced term into writing
Duffy v Newcastle United Football Co Ltd (2000) All ER (D) 892
Special knowledge and skill
Oscar Chess v Williams [1957] 1 WLR 370
Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith (Motors) [1965] 1 WLR 623
Parol Evidence Rule
Henderson v Arthur (1907)
Implied by Custom
Hutton v Warren [1836] 1 M & W 466
Officious bystander test
Shell v Lostock Garage [1977] 1 All ER 481
Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2KB 206
Business Efficacy Test
The Moorcock (1889) 14 PD 64
Term implied by Law
Liverpool City Council v Irwin [1977] AC 239