Intention to Create Legal Relations

£15.00

This Contract Law lecture looks at Intention to Create Legal Relations, it provides a detailed breakdown of the general principles and the key that unpins the doctrine. The intention to create legal relations is an essential element in the formation of a contract. Where no intention to be bound can be attributed to the parties, there is no contract. The test of intention is objective. The courts seek to give effect to the intentions of the parties, whether expressed or presumed.

Learning Outcomes

By the end of this lecture you will be able to:

  1. identify the presumptions relating to domestic and commercial agreements;

  2. understand when and why these presumptions will be rebutted;

  3. apply these to problem questions;

  4. understand the principles relating to capacity to contract.

Cases

Social and Domestic Agreements

Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2KB 571

Merritt v Merritt [1969] 119 NLJ 484

Jones v Padavatton[1969] 2 All ER 616

Simpkins v Pays [1955] 3 All ER 10

Commercial Agreements

Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Customs and Excise [1976] 1 All ER 117, HL

J Evans & Son (Portsmouth) Ltd v Andrea Merzario Ltd [1976] 2 All ER 930, CA

Commercial Agreements: Exceptions

Weeks v Tybald [1604] Noy 11

Rose and Frank Co v JR Crompton &Bros Ltd [1923] 2 KB 261 CA

Jones v Vernon's Pools [1938] 2 All ER 626

Confetti Records v Warner Music UK Ltd [2003] EWHC 1274

Commercial Agreements: Ambiguous Phrasing

Edwards v Skyways Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 349

Commercial Agreements: Collective Bargaining

Ford Motor Co Ltd v Amalgamated Union of Engineering and Foundry Workers [1969] 2 QB 303

Add To Cart

This Contract Law lecture looks at Intention to Create Legal Relations, it provides a detailed breakdown of the general principles and the key that unpins the doctrine. The intention to create legal relations is an essential element in the formation of a contract. Where no intention to be bound can be attributed to the parties, there is no contract. The test of intention is objective. The courts seek to give effect to the intentions of the parties, whether expressed or presumed.

Learning Outcomes

By the end of this lecture you will be able to:

  1. identify the presumptions relating to domestic and commercial agreements;

  2. understand when and why these presumptions will be rebutted;

  3. apply these to problem questions;

  4. understand the principles relating to capacity to contract.

Cases

Social and Domestic Agreements

Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2KB 571

Merritt v Merritt [1969] 119 NLJ 484

Jones v Padavatton[1969] 2 All ER 616

Simpkins v Pays [1955] 3 All ER 10

Commercial Agreements

Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Customs and Excise [1976] 1 All ER 117, HL

J Evans & Son (Portsmouth) Ltd v Andrea Merzario Ltd [1976] 2 All ER 930, CA

Commercial Agreements: Exceptions

Weeks v Tybald [1604] Noy 11

Rose and Frank Co v JR Crompton &Bros Ltd [1923] 2 KB 261 CA

Jones v Vernon's Pools [1938] 2 All ER 626

Confetti Records v Warner Music UK Ltd [2003] EWHC 1274

Commercial Agreements: Ambiguous Phrasing

Edwards v Skyways Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 349

Commercial Agreements: Collective Bargaining

Ford Motor Co Ltd v Amalgamated Union of Engineering and Foundry Workers [1969] 2 QB 303

This Contract Law lecture looks at Intention to Create Legal Relations, it provides a detailed breakdown of the general principles and the key that unpins the doctrine. The intention to create legal relations is an essential element in the formation of a contract. Where no intention to be bound can be attributed to the parties, there is no contract. The test of intention is objective. The courts seek to give effect to the intentions of the parties, whether expressed or presumed.

Learning Outcomes

By the end of this lecture you will be able to:

  1. identify the presumptions relating to domestic and commercial agreements;

  2. understand when and why these presumptions will be rebutted;

  3. apply these to problem questions;

  4. understand the principles relating to capacity to contract.

Cases

Social and Domestic Agreements

Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2KB 571

Merritt v Merritt [1969] 119 NLJ 484

Jones v Padavatton[1969] 2 All ER 616

Simpkins v Pays [1955] 3 All ER 10

Commercial Agreements

Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Customs and Excise [1976] 1 All ER 117, HL

J Evans & Son (Portsmouth) Ltd v Andrea Merzario Ltd [1976] 2 All ER 930, CA

Commercial Agreements: Exceptions

Weeks v Tybald [1604] Noy 11

Rose and Frank Co v JR Crompton &Bros Ltd [1923] 2 KB 261 CA

Jones v Vernon's Pools [1938] 2 All ER 626

Confetti Records v Warner Music UK Ltd [2003] EWHC 1274

Commercial Agreements: Ambiguous Phrasing

Edwards v Skyways Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 349

Commercial Agreements: Collective Bargaining

Ford Motor Co Ltd v Amalgamated Union of Engineering and Foundry Workers [1969] 2 QB 303