Jeremy Bentham

Jeremy Bentham

Who was jeremy bentham?

Jeremy Bentham was the son of a London attorney. He received his early education at the prestigious Westminster School before being sent – at the age of 12 – to Oxford University (Queen's College). There, he attended lectures on the English common law given by William Blackstone, who was a well-known university teacher, lawyer, sometime MP, and later judge. Bentham went on to become one of the most influential philosophers of the 18th century. Beginning in 1763, he attended Lincoln's Inn to pursue a legal education, and he was admitted to the bar in 1772.

Bentham on Rights

Bentham later said that he quickly identified Blackstone's flaws in his lectures when Blackstone claimed that the common law represented the freedoms of the English subject and was established upon concepts of natural rights; these were referred to by Bentham as "nonsense on stilts." A number of legal scholars are of the opinion that the judicial system is responsible for upholding moral rights, while others, such as Bentham, consider this concept to be "nonsense upon stilts." The atrocities committed during the French Revolution, which ended in tyranny and mass executions at the tail end of the 1700s and at the beginning of the 1800s, caused the social contract and natural rights doctrines to fall out of favour. When he refers to natural rights as being "nonsense on stilts," Bentham has these excesses in mind when he makes the statement.

Benthams critique of Blackstone

Blackstone also asserted that the concepts of natural rights were the basis for the establishment of the common law. Bentham later remarked that he had an immediate realisation of Blackstone's errors in reasoning. Bentham's principal writings on law begin with a criticism of the approach that Blackstone had selected and published in his Commentaries on the laws of England (first edition published between 1765 and 1769). Bentham was responding to Blackstone's work, which Blackstone had done between 1765 and 1769. It is generally agreed that Bentham's publications are among the most significant legal works that have ever been put to paper. The Commentaries were a phenomenally successful text, going through over 40 editions, and were largely responsible for the United States of America remaining a common law country after it gained its independence in 1776. Blackstone was correct about the influence of his work, despite the criticisms that have been levelled against his logic. Despite these criticisms, Blackstone was correct about the influence of his work. Blackstone had the expectation that his work, the Commentaries, would serve as a guide for anyone interested in the study of common law, and he was right about the impact of his work. Bentham believed that Blackstone's analysis was flawed due to the fact that it portrayed the common law as growing organically, containing the wisdom of previous decisions, and did not consider the social impact of the law nor offer an image of the law as an instrument of governmental power (Bentham considered Blackstone to be an apologist for the status quo). Bentham believed that Blackstone's analysis was flawed because it depicted the common law as growing organically, containing the wisdom of past decisions. Bentham argued that Blackstone's theory was wrong because it depicted the common law as emerging organically and containing the wisdom of prior judgements. Bentham believed that this was an inaccurate portrayal of how the common law developed.

What the Law Ought to be

Bentham was a reformer, and in order to accomplish this goal, he distinguished between the questions of what the law was and what the law ought to be. The principle that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation" provided a response to the "ought" component of the question. He referred to this principle as the "sacred truth." The 'ought' element of the question was addressed by this principle. It was believed that the concept of "enlightened self-interest" held the key to comprehending ethics, and that a person who always behaved with the goal of maximising his own happiness throughout the course of his life was always acting in the correct manner.

In his Introduction to the principles of morals and legislation (1789), Bentham's goal was to "cut a new road through the wilds of jurisprudence" in order to ensure that the principle of "the greatest happiness of the greatest number" would be used to guide our evaluation of every institution and activity. You should also take into consideration the fact that Bentham was a supporter of a comprehensive institution known as the panopticon. This was going to be an establishment with complete control and visibility; the guards were going to be able to keep a continual eye on the detainees at all times. Many others saw this as the ideal representation of the problems posed by the modernist concern with regulating, defining, organising, separating, cataloguing, and documenting everything that happens.

The reality of the Holocaust, the great imprisonments of the Soviet Union, and the re-education camps used elsewhere in the world testify to the dark side of the attempts to define chaos out of social life and define order with the goal of creating a utopian society. Certainly, Bentham would not have desired that the modern city of reason would end up as a living prison. However, the reality of these atrocities shows the dark side of the attempts to create a utopian society. The relationship between the authority of the contemporary state and the assertion that one is acting in defence of the truth requires ongoing scrutiny.

Positivist Jurist

During his lifetime, Jeremy Bentham was known as the most influential positivist thinker of the modern age. He was also a committed social reformer who vigorously opposed the legal system of England. In doing so, he criticised them, but he did not say that they were not laws because of how poorly they were written. Instead, he attacked them as lousy laws. Since the development of legal positivism, the primary responsibility of natural lawyers has been to demonstrate a link between law and morality that is more consistent with plausibility. To make this link, there would need to be something more substantial than just stating that one is allowed to attack the law for being immoral.

Bentham Utilitarianism

Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy that asserts that the right action is the one that produces the greatest amount of overall happiness or pleasure when compared to other potential actions. It considers the consequences of an action instead of the action itself. This philosophy involves making decisions that benefit a larger group of individuals rather than just one person. It implies that individuals should make choices that result in the greatest good for the greatest number of people. The concept of utilitarianism was developed by British philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill in the 18th and 19th centuries, respectively. This philosophy has been applied in various contexts, such as healthcare, economics, government policies and law.

Jeremy Bentham’s Body

In Bentham's final years, he and a close circle of associates attempted to establish a university that would adhere to the utilitarian philosophy and serve as an alternative to Oxford and Cambridge. These "Godless heathens of Gower Street," as one critic referred to them, were denied permission to build University College London, despite the fact that they were the founders of the institution. Bentham donated his corpse to the institution in his will, with the stipulation that once it was dissected in front of the public and utilised for educational purposes in the field of medicine, it would be reassembled into a "auto-icon" and kept on display indefinitely.

LAW BOOKS

Discover the outstanding Law Tutor books written by an experienced law instructor and lawyer. The Core Series books will help you understand the complexities of legal topics within law subjects. With our Q&A Series books providing model and suggested answer to past exam questions, you can easily prepare for examinations. Perfect aid for law in their study.