EU Administrative Law
By using these EU Administrative Law notes the student will understand the different mechanisms for ensuring compliance with EU law. It looks at how an individual can challenge a law passed by EU institutions. The student will understand how the system of enforcement against states works. Moreover, the notes provide an understanding of how the CJEU ensures that the EU institutions are acting in compliance with EU law.
Cases
Preliminary reference procedure: Article 267
Garofalo v Ministero della Sanita (Cases C-69 to 79/96) [1997] ECR I- 5603
Cases 28-30/62 Da Costa en Schaake NV v. Nederlande Belastingadministratie [1963] ECR 31, [1963] CMLR 224
Read Srl CILFIT v Ministry of Health (Case 283/81) [1982] ECR 3415
Liability of national governments: Articles 258 and 259 TFEU
Commission v Belgium (Case 293/85) [1988] ECR 305)
Commission v Italy (Pork Imports) (Case 7/61) [1961] ECR 317
Commission v Germany (Road Tax) (Case C-195/90 R), [1990] ECR I-3351
Commission v Italy (Case 101/84) 1985
Actions for Annulment and Judicial Review of EU Law: Article 263TFEU
International Business Machines Corporation v. Commission [1981] ECR 2639
NV International Fruit Company v Commission (Case 41- 44/70) [1971] ECR 411
Plaumann & Co v. Commission [1963] ECR 95
Microban International Ltd v Commission (Case T-262/10) [2011]
Grand Chamber Inuit v European Parliament and Council (Case C-583/11P) [2013] ECR I-0000
France v Commission (Case C-327/91)
Roquette Freres SA v. Council [1980] ECR 3333
Eugenio Branco Ld v Commission (Case T-85/94) 1998
Germany v European Parliament and Council (Case C- 233/94)
Efisol SA v Commission of the European Communities 1996 (Case T- 336/94)
Gutmann v Commission (Cases 18 and 35/65).
Ladbroke Racing (Deutschland) GmbH v Commission (Case T-74/92) 13 May 1993.
By using these EU Administrative Law notes the student will understand the different mechanisms for ensuring compliance with EU law. It looks at how an individual can challenge a law passed by EU institutions. The student will understand how the system of enforcement against states works. Moreover, the notes provide an understanding of how the CJEU ensures that the EU institutions are acting in compliance with EU law.
Cases
Preliminary reference procedure: Article 267
Garofalo v Ministero della Sanita (Cases C-69 to 79/96) [1997] ECR I- 5603
Cases 28-30/62 Da Costa en Schaake NV v. Nederlande Belastingadministratie [1963] ECR 31, [1963] CMLR 224
Read Srl CILFIT v Ministry of Health (Case 283/81) [1982] ECR 3415
Liability of national governments: Articles 258 and 259 TFEU
Commission v Belgium (Case 293/85) [1988] ECR 305)
Commission v Italy (Pork Imports) (Case 7/61) [1961] ECR 317
Commission v Germany (Road Tax) (Case C-195/90 R), [1990] ECR I-3351
Commission v Italy (Case 101/84) 1985
Actions for Annulment and Judicial Review of EU Law: Article 263TFEU
International Business Machines Corporation v. Commission [1981] ECR 2639
NV International Fruit Company v Commission (Case 41- 44/70) [1971] ECR 411
Plaumann & Co v. Commission [1963] ECR 95
Microban International Ltd v Commission (Case T-262/10) [2011]
Grand Chamber Inuit v European Parliament and Council (Case C-583/11P) [2013] ECR I-0000
France v Commission (Case C-327/91)
Roquette Freres SA v. Council [1980] ECR 3333
Eugenio Branco Ld v Commission (Case T-85/94) 1998
Germany v European Parliament and Council (Case C- 233/94)
Efisol SA v Commission of the European Communities 1996 (Case T- 336/94)
Gutmann v Commission (Cases 18 and 35/65).
Ladbroke Racing (Deutschland) GmbH v Commission (Case T-74/92) 13 May 1993.
By using these EU Administrative Law notes the student will understand the different mechanisms for ensuring compliance with EU law. It looks at how an individual can challenge a law passed by EU institutions. The student will understand how the system of enforcement against states works. Moreover, the notes provide an understanding of how the CJEU ensures that the EU institutions are acting in compliance with EU law.
Cases
Preliminary reference procedure: Article 267
Garofalo v Ministero della Sanita (Cases C-69 to 79/96) [1997] ECR I- 5603
Cases 28-30/62 Da Costa en Schaake NV v. Nederlande Belastingadministratie [1963] ECR 31, [1963] CMLR 224
Read Srl CILFIT v Ministry of Health (Case 283/81) [1982] ECR 3415
Liability of national governments: Articles 258 and 259 TFEU
Commission v Belgium (Case 293/85) [1988] ECR 305)
Commission v Italy (Pork Imports) (Case 7/61) [1961] ECR 317
Commission v Germany (Road Tax) (Case C-195/90 R), [1990] ECR I-3351
Commission v Italy (Case 101/84) 1985
Actions for Annulment and Judicial Review of EU Law: Article 263TFEU
International Business Machines Corporation v. Commission [1981] ECR 2639
NV International Fruit Company v Commission (Case 41- 44/70) [1971] ECR 411
Plaumann & Co v. Commission [1963] ECR 95
Microban International Ltd v Commission (Case T-262/10) [2011]
Grand Chamber Inuit v European Parliament and Council (Case C-583/11P) [2013] ECR I-0000
France v Commission (Case C-327/91)
Roquette Freres SA v. Council [1980] ECR 3333
Eugenio Branco Ld v Commission (Case T-85/94) 1998
Germany v European Parliament and Council (Case C- 233/94)
Efisol SA v Commission of the European Communities 1996 (Case T- 336/94)
Gutmann v Commission (Cases 18 and 35/65).
Ladbroke Racing (Deutschland) GmbH v Commission (Case T-74/92) 13 May 1993.