EU Administrative Law

£5.00

By using these EU Administrative Law notes the student will understand the different mechanisms for ensuring compliance with EU law. It looks at how an individual can challenge a law passed by EU institutions. The student will understand how the system of enforcement against states works. Moreover, the notes provide an understanding of how the CJEU ensures that the EU institutions are acting in compliance with EU law.

Cases

Preliminary reference procedure: Article 267

Garofalo v Ministero della Sanita (Cases C-69 to 79/96) [1997] ECR I-  5603

Cases 28-30/62 Da Costa en Schaake NV v. Nederlande Belastingadministratie [1963] ECR 31, [1963] CMLR 224

Read Srl CILFIT v Ministry of Health (Case 283/81) [1982] ECR 3415

Liability of national governments: Articles 258 and 259 TFEU

Commission v Belgium (Case 293/85) [1988] ECR 305)

Commission v Italy (Pork Imports) (Case 7/61) [1961] ECR 317

Commission v Germany (Road Tax) (Case C-195/90 R), [1990] ECR I-3351

Commission v Italy (Case 101/84) 1985

Actions for Annulment and Judicial Review of EU Law: Article 263TFEU

International Business Machines Corporation v. Commission [1981] ECR 2639

NV International Fruit Company v Commission (Case 41- 44/70) [1971] ECR 411

Plaumann & Co v. Commission [1963] ECR 95

Microban International Ltd v Commission (Case T-262/10) [2011]

Grand Chamber Inuit v European Parliament and Council (Case C-583/11P) [2013] ECR I-0000

France v Commission (Case C-327/91)

Roquette Freres SA v. Council [1980] ECR 3333

Eugenio Branco Ld v Commission (Case T-85/94) 1998

Germany v European Parliament and Council (Case C- 233/94)

Efisol SA v Commission of the European Communities 1996 (Case T- 336/94)

Gutmann v Commission (Cases 18 and 35/65).

Ladbroke Racing (Deutschland) GmbH v Commission (Case T-74/92) 13 May 1993.

Add To Cart

By using these EU Administrative Law notes the student will understand the different mechanisms for ensuring compliance with EU law. It looks at how an individual can challenge a law passed by EU institutions. The student will understand how the system of enforcement against states works. Moreover, the notes provide an understanding of how the CJEU ensures that the EU institutions are acting in compliance with EU law.

Cases

Preliminary reference procedure: Article 267

Garofalo v Ministero della Sanita (Cases C-69 to 79/96) [1997] ECR I-  5603

Cases 28-30/62 Da Costa en Schaake NV v. Nederlande Belastingadministratie [1963] ECR 31, [1963] CMLR 224

Read Srl CILFIT v Ministry of Health (Case 283/81) [1982] ECR 3415

Liability of national governments: Articles 258 and 259 TFEU

Commission v Belgium (Case 293/85) [1988] ECR 305)

Commission v Italy (Pork Imports) (Case 7/61) [1961] ECR 317

Commission v Germany (Road Tax) (Case C-195/90 R), [1990] ECR I-3351

Commission v Italy (Case 101/84) 1985

Actions for Annulment and Judicial Review of EU Law: Article 263TFEU

International Business Machines Corporation v. Commission [1981] ECR 2639

NV International Fruit Company v Commission (Case 41- 44/70) [1971] ECR 411

Plaumann & Co v. Commission [1963] ECR 95

Microban International Ltd v Commission (Case T-262/10) [2011]

Grand Chamber Inuit v European Parliament and Council (Case C-583/11P) [2013] ECR I-0000

France v Commission (Case C-327/91)

Roquette Freres SA v. Council [1980] ECR 3333

Eugenio Branco Ld v Commission (Case T-85/94) 1998

Germany v European Parliament and Council (Case C- 233/94)

Efisol SA v Commission of the European Communities 1996 (Case T- 336/94)

Gutmann v Commission (Cases 18 and 35/65).

Ladbroke Racing (Deutschland) GmbH v Commission (Case T-74/92) 13 May 1993.

By using these EU Administrative Law notes the student will understand the different mechanisms for ensuring compliance with EU law. It looks at how an individual can challenge a law passed by EU institutions. The student will understand how the system of enforcement against states works. Moreover, the notes provide an understanding of how the CJEU ensures that the EU institutions are acting in compliance with EU law.

Cases

Preliminary reference procedure: Article 267

Garofalo v Ministero della Sanita (Cases C-69 to 79/96) [1997] ECR I-  5603

Cases 28-30/62 Da Costa en Schaake NV v. Nederlande Belastingadministratie [1963] ECR 31, [1963] CMLR 224

Read Srl CILFIT v Ministry of Health (Case 283/81) [1982] ECR 3415

Liability of national governments: Articles 258 and 259 TFEU

Commission v Belgium (Case 293/85) [1988] ECR 305)

Commission v Italy (Pork Imports) (Case 7/61) [1961] ECR 317

Commission v Germany (Road Tax) (Case C-195/90 R), [1990] ECR I-3351

Commission v Italy (Case 101/84) 1985

Actions for Annulment and Judicial Review of EU Law: Article 263TFEU

International Business Machines Corporation v. Commission [1981] ECR 2639

NV International Fruit Company v Commission (Case 41- 44/70) [1971] ECR 411

Plaumann & Co v. Commission [1963] ECR 95

Microban International Ltd v Commission (Case T-262/10) [2011]

Grand Chamber Inuit v European Parliament and Council (Case C-583/11P) [2013] ECR I-0000

France v Commission (Case C-327/91)

Roquette Freres SA v. Council [1980] ECR 3333

Eugenio Branco Ld v Commission (Case T-85/94) 1998

Germany v European Parliament and Council (Case C- 233/94)

Efisol SA v Commission of the European Communities 1996 (Case T- 336/94)

Gutmann v Commission (Cases 18 and 35/65).

Ladbroke Racing (Deutschland) GmbH v Commission (Case T-74/92) 13 May 1993.